BLUF*

Good morning,

"So who's in charge of Bitcoin?"

Simple: no one. That's the genius—and the gamble.

Every cycle, someone steps up to “fix” what’s broken.

But Bitcoin’s only promise is no promises—No rulers. Just the rules of code.

Cost of interference? A chain of events that can’t be undone.

Keeping it real,
Austin Campbell

Teaching Blockchain & DeFi at NYU
Talking to institutions at Zero Knowledge

BITE THE APPLE

Bitcoin’s bottom line: no human overrides.

Luke Dashjr begs an exception—to eliminate child abuse content.

Adam Back, the cryptographer Bitcoin’s creator Satoshi cited, calls this “censorship tech.” When he says it’s a line you can’t cross without breaking everything, believe him.

Dashjr’s pitch? Empower a select committee (multisig quorum) to spot CSAM —not by looking at the content, but by using tech that can sniff it out & swap it out.

REALITY CHECK
1
Ideal
Permissionless paradise—no rulers, only rules
2
Pitch
Committee to identify and overwrite illegal content
3
Problem
Once you can edit anything, you must edit everything

Open source's fatal flaw—you can't fire volunteers. Even toxic ones.

David Morris

But that flaw is gaining ground.

4,700 Knots nodes are already running.

Every download? another vote for committee rule.

SNOWBALL EFFECT

Day 1: Remove illegal content

Week 1: Add terrorism financing

Month 1: Include sanctions violations

Year 1: Expand to "broadly harmful" content

KNOT THE KING

BACKSTORY

2015
Luke Dashjr becomes Bitcoin's BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) manager. Proposals start dying in his queue.
2017
Developers complain. Nothing changes.
2019
More managers join the BIP then immediately, its throughput triples.
2023
Dashjr goes solo with Knots. One man. One repo. One vision.
2024
“Rosa Parks was committing the sin of disobedience.”
— Luke Dashjr
2025
So, the man who thinks defying authority is sinful... seeks to become Bitcoin's authority.

Jameson Lopp suspects its sus…sabotage disguised as stewardship.

PRICE OF PRECEDENT

Markets don't wait for implementation —they price in risk.

On censorship support, Bitcoin can expect a 10% price cut.

When Dashjr's proposal leaks? Bitcoin dips 2%.

When MARA mining pool "considers" the framework. Another 1%.

When Ocean Pool announces "openness to safety measures." Down 3% more.

6% in three days? If this spreads, $100 billion vanishes.

WINNERS vs LOSERS

Winners

  • → Surveillance vendors: New contracts
  • → Traditional banks: Less competition
  • → CBDCs: Better positioning

Losers

  • → BTC holders: 10% haircut likely
  • → Privacy users: Fewer options
  • → Unbanked: Still unbanked

ZERO OUT

Nobody wants CSAM.
But neutrality is Bitcoin. Not neutral? Not Bitcoin.
  • Trade neutrality for discretion, and markets slash trust. (Think: -10%)

  • Fix CSAM with law enforcement—not force-edit committee, vigilante.

  • Bitcoin: rules without rulers—or everything breaks.

Bottom line: First exception “feels fine”. Last one never does.

ZERO TIME

$300 Trillion Oopsie

Paxos minted $300T in PUSD.
…2.5x all money on Earth 😂

Blockchain: Fixed in seconds
Banks: Hides errors for weeks

SWIFT Picks ETH

*Screams overheard in XRP*

XRP price: Down.

Sad!

ZERO INSIDER

Austin

Spoke (and made my modeling debut) at the Chicago Payments Symposium.

David

1 More on Knots and his crusade for a committee? Jump to Zero Insights.

2 Missed out? Read letters 008 on Plasma + Cloudflare, 007 on WLF + Justin Sun, 006 on DATs & MicroStrategy

Reply

or to participate